A-A+

Currently each citizen can confirm others per

2022-08-01 22:45:06 问答库 阅读 168 次

问题详情

Currently, each citizen can confirm others personal information by paying five yuan and sending a short message to National Citizen Identity Information Center. Some scholars argue against the service. They think it is an intrusion of personal privacy. Do you agree or disagree with them? Write an essay of about 400 words on the following topic: Does Personal Information Inquiry Intrude Personal Privacy? In the first part of your essay you should state clearly your main argument, and in the second part you should support your argument with appropriate details. In the last part you should bring what you have written to a natural conclusion or make a summary. Marks will be awarded for content, organization, grammar and appropriateness. Failure to follow the above instructions may result in a loss of marks.请帮忙给出正确答案和分析,谢谢!

参考答案

正确答案:Does Personal Information Inquiry Intrude Personal Privacy?With the gradual awareness of personal privacy and the consequences resulting from privacy intrusions more and more people become cautious about their privacy protection. However recentlyone can have access to anyone"s detailed information. By inputting a person"s name and his or her ID numberwe will confirm whether the items match each other. If the two match we will see the picture of its owner. We can also bind our mobile phone numbers e-mail accounts and other information with the general identity numbers in the system. Under the authorization of usany person can have access to our detailed information. Although according to the personal information inquiry service provider it satisfies the current needs of our society and some people hold the opinion that the service will intrude personal privacy. As for me I agree with the latter opinion.Firstlyas the service is based on its database connected to the Internetit is likely that hackers will have an easy access to anyone"s personal information at will. This concern is not an exaggeration. Even the claimed most secure pentagon website has frequent unwanted visitorsthat is hackers how can we trust that the service is able to protect our personal information from being exposed to hackers? Besidesas our privacies have been converted to a form of commodities it is likely that motivated by money employees of the service provider may sell our "privacy products" for their own benefits.Secondly while the service provider boosts that it is reliable in that it will not provide personal information without due authorization of the person we must bear in our mind that some Chinese people are excellent at making fake certificates and authorization documents. As the required procedure indicates anyone can manage to know what he desires to know if he can procure his target"s authorization and a copy of the target"s ID card. As a matter of fact it is only a technical matter for some malicious guys to obtain a copy of his target"s ID card and make a fake authorization document. In sum as the real world is teeming with malicious people driven by money and the Internet smart hackersour privacies are likely to be put at the mercy of those guys. The service provider seemingly contributes a lot to telling those malicious guys where to find our personal information. FinallyI can not help wondering why the service provider is able to collect our personal information without our authorization. Have not our privacies been intruded?
DoesPersonalInformationInquiryIntrudePersonalPrivacy?Withthegradualawarenessofpersonalprivacyandtheconsequencesresultingfromprivacyintrusions,moreandmorepeoplebecomecautiousabouttheirprivacyprotection.However,recently,onecanhaveaccesstoanyone"sdetailedinformation.Byinputtingaperson"snameandhisorherIDnumber,wewillconfirmwhethertheitemsmatcheachother.Ifthetwomatch,wewillseethepictureofitsowner.Wecanalsobindourmobilephonenumbers,e-mailaccounts,andotherinformationwiththegeneralidentitynumbersinthesystem.Undertheauthorizationofus,anypersoncanhaveaccesstoourdetailedinformation.Althoughaccordingtothepersonalinformationinquiryserviceprovider,itsatisfiesthecurrentneedsofoursociety,andsomepeopleholdtheopinionthattheservicewillintrudepersonalprivacy.Asforme,Iagreewiththelatteropinion.Firstly,astheserviceisbasedonitsdatabaseconnectedtotheInternet,itislikelythathackerswillhaveaneasyaccesstoanyone"spersonalinformationatwill.Thisconcernisnotanexaggeration.Eventheclaimedmostsecurepentagonwebsitehasfrequentunwantedvisitors,thatis,hackers,howcanwetrustthattheserviceisabletoprotectourpersonalinformationfrombeingexposedtohackers?Besides,asourprivacieshavebeenconvertedtoaformofcommodities,itislikelythatmotivatedbymoney,employeesoftheserviceprovidermaysellour"privacyproducts"fortheirownbenefits.Secondly,whiletheserviceproviderbooststhatitisreliableinthatitwillnotprovidepersonalinformationwithoutdueauthorizationoftheperson,wemustbearinourmindthatsomeChinesepeopleareexcellentatmakingfakecertificatesandauthorizationdocuments.Astherequiredprocedureindicates,anyonecanmanagetoknowwhathedesirestoknowifhecanprocurehistarget"sauthorizationandacopyofthetarget"sIDcard.Asamatteroffact,itisonlyatechnicalmatterforsomemaliciousguystoobtainacopyofhistarget"sIDcard,andmakeafakeauthorizationdocument.Insum,astherealworldisteemingwithmaliciouspeopledrivenbymoney,andtheInternetsmarthackers,ourprivaciesarelikelytobeputatthemercyofthoseguys.Theserviceproviderseeminglycontributesalottotellingthosemaliciousguyswheretofindourpersonalinformation.Finally,Icannothelpwonderingwhytheserviceproviderisabletocollectourpersonalinformationwithoutourauthorization.Havenotourprivaciesbeenintruded?

考点: