Which of the following CANNOT be concluded fro
问题详情
Which of the following CANNOT be concluded from the passage?
A.Disney has introduced convincing evidence to defend itself.
B.Disney has destroyed some important papers on purpose,
C.Disney has lost in the 1999 case with Jeffrey Katzenberg.
D.The stock price of Disney has been going down for a period of time.此题为多项选择题。请帮忙给出正确答案和分析,谢谢!
参考答案
正确答案:A
解析:推理题。解体点散布在文章各处,可以用排除法。第二段提到,“…company executives knowingly destroyed important papers related to its licensing deals”,由此可知,迪斯尼故意损坏相关的文件,故选项B正确。由最后一段的“who won a $250 million settlement for former Disney studio chief Jeffrey Katzenberg in a hyper-charged 1999 case”知,迪斯尼输掉了官司,赔偿了2亿5千万美元,故选项C正确。由文章第二段提到的“Eisner is under attack for Disney’s chronically weak stock price”知,迪斯尼的股票长期疲软,故选项D正确。文中没有提到,迪斯尼能够提出有力的证据来替自己辩护,A选项与原文不相符。故本题的正确答案为A选项。