A-A+

Small Schools Rising This year&39;s list of th

2022-08-05 15:20:48 问答库 阅读 169 次

问题详情

Small Schools Rising This year&39;s list of the top 100 high schools shows that today, those with fewer students are flourishing.
Fifty years ago, they were the latest thing in educational reform. big, modem, suburban high schools with students counted in the thousands. As baby boomers (二战后婴儿潮时期出生的人) came of high-school age, big schools promised economic efficiency, a greater choice of courses, and, of course, better football teams. Only years later did we understand the trade-offs this involved: the creation of excessive bureaucracies (官僚机构), the difficulty of forging personal connections between teachers and students. SAT scores began dropping in 1963; today, on average, 30% of students do not complete high school in four years, a figure that rises to 50% in poor urban neighborhoods. While the emphasis on teaching to higher, test-driven standards as set in No Child Left Behind resulted in significantly better performance in elementary (and some middle) schools, high schools for a variety of reasons seemed to have made little progress.
Size isn&39;t everything, but it does matter, and the past decade has seen a noticeable countertrend toward smaller schools. This has been due, in part, to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, which has invested $1.8 billion in American high schools, helping to open about 1,000 small schools—most of them with about 400 kids each, with an average enrollment of only 150 per grade. About 500 more are on the drawing board. Districts all over the country are taking notice, along with mayors in cities like New York, Chicago and San Diego. The movement includes independent public charter schools, such as No.1 BASIS in Tucson, with only 120 high-schoolers and 18 graduates this year. It embraces district- sanctioned magnet schools, such as the Talented and Gifted School, with 198 students, and the Science and Engineering Magnet, with 383, which share a building in Dallas, as well as the City Honors School in Buffalo, N.Y., which grew out of volunteer evening seminars for students. And it includes alternative schools with students selected by lottery (抽签), such as H-B Woodlawn in Arlington, Va.And most noticeable of all, there is the phenomenon of large urban and suburban high schools that have split up into smaller units of a few hundred, generally housed in the same grounds that once boasted thousands of students all marching to the same band.
Hillsdale High School in San Mateo, Calif., is one of those, ranking No.423—among the top 2% in the country—on Newsweek&39;s annual ranking of America&39;s top high schools. The success of small schools is apparent in the listings. Ten years ago, when the first Newsweek list based on college-level test participation was published, only three of the top 100 schools had graduating classes smaller than 100 students. This year there are 22. Nearly 250 schools on the full Newsweek list of the top 5% of schools nationally had fewer than 200 graduates in 2007.
Although many of Hillsdale&39;s students came from wealthy households, by the late 1990s average test scores were sliding and it had earned the unaffectionate nickname (绰号) "Hillsjail". Jeff Gilbert, a Hillsdale teacher who became principal last year, remembers sitting with other teachers watching students file out a graduation ceremony and asking one another in astonishment, "How did that student graduate?"
So in 2003 Hillsdale remade itself into three "houses", romantically named Florence, Marrakech and Kyoto. Each of the 300 arriving ninth grades are randomly (随机地) assigned to one of the houses, where they will keep the same four core subject teachers for two years, before moving on to another for 11th and 12th grades. The closeness this system cultivates is reinforced by the institution of "advisory" classes. Teachers meet with students in groups of 25, five mornings a week, for open-ended discussions of everything from homework problems to bad Saturday-night dates. The advisers also meet with students privately and stay in touch with parents, so they are deeply invested in the students&39; success. "We&39;re constantly talking about one another&39;s advisees," says English Teacher Chris Crockett. "If you hear that yours isn&39;t doing well in math, or see them sitting outside the dean&39;s office, it&39;s like a personal failure." Along with the new structure came a more demanding academic program; the percentage of freshmen taking biology jumped from 17 to 95. "It was rough for some, but by senior year, two-thirds have moved up to physics," says Gilbert. "Our kids are coming to school in part because they know there are adults here who know them and care for them." But not all schools show advances after downsizing, and it remains to be seen whether smaller schools will be a cure-all solution.
The Newsweek list of top U.S. high schools was made this year, as in years past, according to a single metric, the proportion of students taking college-level exams. Over the years this system has come in for its share of criticism for its simplicity. But that is also its strength: it&39;s easy for readers to understand, and to do the arithmetic for their own schools if they&39;d like.
Ranking schools is always controversial, and this year a group of 38 superintendents (地区教育主管) from five states wrote to ask that their schools be excluded from the calculation. "It is impossible to know which high schools are &39;the best &39;in the nation," their letter read, in part. "Determining whether different schools do or don&39;t offer a high quality of education requires a look at many different measures, including students&39; overall academic accomplishments and their subsequent performance in college, and taking into consideration the unique needs of their communities."
In the end, the superintendents agreed to provide the data we sought, which is, after all, public information. There is, in our view, no real dispute here; we are all seeking the same thing, which is schools that better serve our children and our nation by encouraging students to tackle tough subjects under the guidance of gifted teachers. And if we keep working toward that goal, someday, perhaps, a list won&39;t be necessary.
1.Fifty years ago, big, modem, suburban high schools were established in the hope of ______.
A. ensuring no child is left behind
B. increasing economic efficiency
C. improving students&39; performance on SAT
D. providing good education for baby boomers
2. What happened as a result of setting up big schools?
A. Teachers&39; workload increased.
B. Students&39; performance declined.
C. Administration became centralized.
D. Students focused more on test scores.
3.What is said about the schools funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation?
A. They are usually magnet schools.
B. They are often located in poor neighborhoods.
C. They are popular with high-achieving students.
D. They are mostly small in size.
4.What is most noticeable about the current trend in high school education?
A. Some large schools have split up into smaller ones.
B. A great variety of schools have sprung up in urban and suburban areas.
C. Many schools compete for the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation funds.
D. Students have to meet higher academic standards.
5. Newsweek ranked high schools according to ______.
A. their students&39; academic achievement
B. the number of their students admitted to college
C. the size and number of their graduating classes
D. their college-level test participation
6.What can we learn about Hillsdale&39;s students in the late 1990s?
A. They were made to study hard like prisoners.
B. They called each other by unaffectionate nicknames.
C. Most of them did not have any sense of discipline.
D. Their school performance was getting worse.
7. According to Jeff Gilbert, the "advisory" classes at Hillsdale were set up so that students could ______.
A. tell their teachers what they did on weekends
B. experience a great deal of pleasure in learning
C. maintain closer relationship with their teachers
D. tackle the demanding biology and physics courses
8. ______is still considered a strength of Newsweek&39;s school ranking system in spite of the criticism it receives.
9.According to the 38 superintendents, to rank schools scientifically, it is necessary to use____________.
10.To better serve the children and our nation, schools should hire gifted teachers and encourage students to take____________.请帮忙给出每个问题的正确答案和分析,谢谢!

参考答案

问题 1 答案解析:D

●定位:根据题干信息词Fifty years ago,将答案定位到第一段开头部分。
●精析:第一段第二句提到由于婴儿潮时期出生的人到了上高中的年龄,大型学校承诺可以提高经济
效益,有更多的课程供选择,所以50年前建立大型的、现代化的城市高中是希望给婴儿潮时期出生的
人提供良好的教育,故选D。题干中in the hope of和原文中promised属于同义转述。



问题 2 答案解析:B

根据题干中result of setting up big schools可以定位至文章的第一段第四句,由该句可知学生的成绩在下降,最后一句也提到了由于多种原因,高中并没有取得多大进步,学生的成绩并没有像小学和某学初中一样提高。



问题 3 答案解析:D

细节题。根据题干中Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation定位至文章的第二段第二句,由该句可知,比尔和梅琳达?盖茨基金会建立的学校大多数规模较小。



问题 4 答案解析:A

细节题。根据题干中的mostnoticeable可以定位至第二段的最后一句,该句中提到And most noticeable ofall, there is the phenomenon of large urban and suburban high schools that havesplit up into smaller units of a few hundred, 由此可知,当前高中教育趋势中最引人注意的就是一规模大的学校分成了若干只有几百人的小规模学校。



问题 5 答案解析:D

细节题。根据Newsweek ranked high schools定位至文章第三段第三句,由该句可知,《新闻周刊》根据大学水平测试的参与情况来对高中进行排名。



问题 6 答案解析:D

细节题。根据题干中的Hillsdale和late 1990s可以定位 到第四段第一句,由该句可知学生的成绩在20世纪90年代下滑了,成绩变得更差。



问题 7 答案解析:C

推理题。根据题干中的“advisory”classes可以定位至第 五段第三句,由该句可知“咨询”课程增强了学生与老师的亲密关系。



问题 8 答案解析:

Simplicity。细节题。根据题干中的Newsweek和criticism可 以定位至第六段倒数第二句,该句中提到Over the yearsthis system has come in for its share of criticism for its simplicity,由此可知《新闻周刊》受到批评是因为其simplicity。但是最后一句却也指出Butthat is also its strength,由此可知simplicity也是《新闻周刊》的一项优势。



问题 9 答案解析:

答案many different measures
◆定位:根据题干信息词38 superintendents可将答案定位到第七段中间部分。
◆精析:第七段提到,38位地区教育主管要求不对他们负责的学校进行排名,并提到“不可能知道哪所学校是美国最好的。不同的学校是否能提供更高质量的教育需要从许多不同的角度评判”,由此判断他们认为,想要给学校进行科学的排名有必要使用诸多不同的评判方法,故得答案many different measures。



问题 10 答案解析:

tough subjects。细节题。根据题干中的better serve the children and our nation可以定位至文章最后一段倒数第二句, 由该句可知,学校鼓励学生在有才华的老师的指导下学习一些难度较大的科目。

译文:

小型学校的崛起

今年的100所最佳高中排行榜表明,如今,那些拥有较少学生的学校正在蓬勃发展。

50年前,拥有成千上万学生的大型现代化城郊高中是教育改革的最新事物。[1]随着二战后婴儿潮时期出生的人到了读高中的年龄,大型学校承诺提高经济效率,有更多的课程可供选择,当然,还有更好的橄榄球队。多年之后我们才看到这种做法引发的问题:过多官僚机构的设立,师生之间私人关系的建立困难重重。[2]1963SAT(学术能力评估测试)分数开始下降;如今,平均有30%的学生在四年内不能完成高中学业,在城市贫民区这一比例达到了50%。然而在“有教无类”法案中设定的要求更高的、以应试为导向的教育标准使学生在小学(以及一些初中)校园里明显表现得更好,而高中由于各种各样的原因似乎没什么进展。

规模不是一切,但是确实很重要。过去的十年见证了学校朝着更小规模发展的显著反向趋势。在某种程度上,这种趋势与比尔和梅琳达·盖茨基金会有关。[3]该基金会已经成为美国高中投资了18亿美元,帮助建立了大约1000所小型学校。这些小型学校大部分只有约400个孩子,平均每个年级只有150名学生。还有大约500所小型学校处于规划阶段。全国各北都在关注这种现象,包括纽约、芝加哥和圣地亚哥市的市长。这种趋势包括独立的公立特许学校,如今年只有120名学生和18名毕业生的图森市的第一基础高中。也包括地区批准的特色中学,如拥有198名学生的英杰学校,以及拥有383名学生的科学与工程特色中学,这两所学校在达拉斯共用一栋大楼。还有纽约州布法罗市的城市荣誉中学,这所学校从学生自愿参加的夜间研讨班发展而来。此外还包括通过抽签选择学生的新式学校,如弗吉尼亚州阿灵顿的H-B伍德朗中学。[4]最引人注目的是这样一种现象:城市和郊区的大规模高中已经分立成为规模更小的、只拥有几百名学生的学校。这些学校一般就位于之前的学校原址它们曾以数千名学生在同一管乐队的乐曲声中整齐列队而感到自豪。

加州圣马特奥市的希尔斯代尔高中就是其中之一。在《新闻周刊》美国年度顶尖高中排行榜上,该校排名第423位,属于美国排名前2%的高中学校。小型学校的成功在排行榜中显而易见。[5]十年前,《新闻周刊》首次公布了基于大学水平测试参加情况的排名,前100名的学校中只有3所学校的毕业班学生少于100名,今年却增加到了22所。在《新闻周刊》发布的全国前5%的高中排行榜中,大约布250所学校在2007年的毕业生少于200

[6]尽管希尔斯代尔高中的许多学生来自富裕家庭,但20世纪90年代末期,他们的考试平均成绩却一直在下降,这使得该校得到了一个无情的绰号——“希尔斯监狱”。希尔斯代尔高中的一名老师杰夫·吉尔伯特去年成为该校的校长,他记得和其他老师坐在一起,看着学生们在毕业典礼后陆续离开,互相惊讶地问道:“那个学生是怎么毕业的?”

因此.2003年希尔斯代尔高中改造成了三个分部,浪漫地命名为佛罗伦萨、马拉喀什和京都。升入该校的3009年级学生被随机地分到三个分部中的任意一个。在那里,在他们转到另一分部读11年级和12年级以前,他们的四门核心科目的老师一直不变。[7]这个体制所培养的师生亲密性在“咨询”课程中得到了加强。老师在一周的五个早上与25人为一组的学生见面,进行开放式的讨论,话题从家庭作业中的问题到周六晚上糟糕的约会,五花八门,应有尽有。指导老师在私下里也会与学生见面,并与家长保持联系,所以他们为学生的成功付出了许多。英语老师克丽丝·克罗克特说:“我们经常讨论彼此指导的学生。如果你听说你的学生数学不好,或者看到他们坐在教务长办公室的外面,那就好像我们个人的失败一样。”伴随这个祈体制出现的是一个要求更高的课程体系;选择生物学的新生比例从17%跃至95%。吉尔伯特说:“这对一些学生来说非常困难,但是到了高年级的时候,三分之二的学生会转修物理学。我们的孩子来到这所学校,在一定程度上是因为他们知道这里有大人了解并关心他们。”但不是所有的学校在缩小规模之后都有所改善,更小规模的学校是否能解决所有问题尚待分晓。

今年《新闻周刊》的美国最佳高中排名与往年一样,是根据单一的衡量标准而定的,即参加大学水平考试的学生比例。[8]多年以来,这一方法因为它的简单受到了一些批评。但是简单也是它的优势:读者很容易理解,如果他们愿意的话,还可以为自己的学校算出排名

给学校排名一直存在争议。今年来自五个州的3酬地区教育主管写信要求把他们所在地区的学校排除在排名之外。他们来信的部分内容是:“不可能知道哪所学校是美国最好的。[9]判定不同的学校是否能提供更高质量的教育需要从许多不同的角度评判,包括学生的整体学术成就和他们之后在大学里的表现,还要考虑他们所生活社区的独特需求。”

最终,这些地区教育主管同意提供我们想要的数据,毕竟这是公共信息。在我们看来,这里没有真正的争议,[10]我们都在追求同样的事情,那就是通过鼓励学生在有才能的老师的指导下攻克难学的科目,学校能更好地服务于我们的孩子和国家。如果我们继续向这个目标努力,总有一天,排名或许就没必要了。

考点: